Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder patterns have effect" » "coder cover patterns have effect" (Expand search), "coder border patterns have effect" (Expand search), "coder color patterns have effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns are effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns case effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder patterns have effect" (Expand search), "code code patterns have effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec patterns have effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns wave effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns haven effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns wave effects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder patterns have effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder patterns have effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder patterns have effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.