Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder patterns findings effect" » "coder coder patients findings effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns feeding effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns mining effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns binding effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns binding effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns grinding effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns findings effect" (Expand search), "coder border patterns findings effect" (Expand search), "coder color patterns findings effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder patterns findings effect" (Expand search), "code code patterns findings effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec patterns findings effect" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder patterns findings effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder patterns findings effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder patterns findings effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.