Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder patterns feeding effect" » "coder coder patterns depending effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns during effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns using effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns feeding effect" (Expand search), "coder border patterns feeding effect" (Expand search), "coder color patterns feeding effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns feeding effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns feeding affect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns feeding affects" (Expand search), "coder decoder patterns feeding effect" (Expand search), "code code patterns feeding effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec patterns feeding effect" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder patterns feeding effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder patterns feeding effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder patterns feeding effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.