Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder patterns are effects" » "coder cover patterns are effects" (Expand search), "coder border patterns are effects" (Expand search), "coder color patterns are effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns and effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns at effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns from effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder patterns are effects" (Expand search), "code code patterns are effects" (Expand search), "decoder codec patterns are effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns area effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns age effects" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns are affects" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder patterns are effects\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder patterns are effects ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder patterns are effects") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.