Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder patterns are effect" » "coder cover patterns are effect" (Expand search), "coder border patterns are effect" (Expand search), "coder color patterns are effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns and effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns at effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns from effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder patterns are effect" (Expand search), "code code patterns are effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec patterns are effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns area effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns rare effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns are effects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder patterns are effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder patterns are effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder patterns are effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.