Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder pattern task effect" » "coder cover pattern task effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns task effect" (Expand search), "coder powder pattern task effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern test effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern stasis effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder pattern task effect" (Expand search), "code code pattern task effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec pattern task effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern stark effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern stack effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern risk effects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pattern task effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pattern task effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pattern task effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.