Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pattern learning effect" » "coder coder pattern defining effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patient learning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern scanning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern learning object" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern learning project" (Expand search), "coder cover pattern learning effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns learning effect" (Expand search), "coder powder pattern learning effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder pattern learning effect" (Expand search), "code code pattern learning effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec pattern learning effect" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pattern learning effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pattern learning effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pattern learning effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.