Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pattern in programming" » "coder coder pattern and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern _ programming" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern c programming" (Expand search), "coder cover pattern in programming" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns in programming" (Expand search), "coder powder pattern in programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder pattern in programming" (Expand search), "code code pattern in programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec pattern in programming" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pattern in programming\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pattern in programming ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pattern in programming") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.