Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pattern definition effect" » "coder coder pattern recognition effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern detection effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern determination effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern deposition effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern definition extent" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern defoliation effects" (Expand search), "coder cover pattern definition effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns definition effect" (Expand search), "coder powder pattern definition effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder pattern definition effect" (Expand search), "code code pattern definition effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec pattern definition effect" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pattern definition effect\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pattern definition effect ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pattern definition effect") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.