Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pattern defining effect" » "coder coder pattern mining effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern definition effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern design effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern relining effects" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern learning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern training effect" (Expand search), "coder cover pattern defining effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns defining effect" (Expand search), "coder powder pattern defining effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder pattern defining effect" (Expand search), "code code pattern defining effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec pattern defining effect" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pattern defining effect\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pattern defining effect ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pattern defining effect") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.