Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder pattern decoding effect" » "coder coder pattern defining effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns according effect" (Expand search), "coder coder patterns depending effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern doping effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern reading effect" (Expand search), "coder coder pattern herding effect" (Expand search), "coder cover pattern decoding effect" (Expand search), "coder cover patterns decoding effect" (Expand search), "coder powder pattern decoding effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder pattern decoding effect" (Expand search), "code code pattern decoding effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec pattern decoding effect" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder pattern decoding effect\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder pattern decoding effect ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder pattern decoding effect") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.