Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"coder coder pattern blocking effect" » "coder coder pattern blocks effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder pattern breaking effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder pattern block effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder pattern blanching effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder pattern bleaching effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder pattern blockade effects" (Expandir a busca), "coder cover pattern blocking effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder cover patterns blocking effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder powder pattern blocking effect" (Expandir a busca), "coder decoder pattern blocking effect" (Expandir a busca), "code code pattern blocking effect" (Expandir a busca), "decoder codec pattern blocking effect" (Expandir a busca)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in piton python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in pitons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "_ python python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("coder coder pattern blocking effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"coder coder pattern blocking effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( coder coder pattern blocking effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.