Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder path dependency processing" » "coder coder path dependence processes" (Expand search), "coder coder path dependency parsing" (Expand search), "coder coder path dependent processes" (Expand search), "coder coder path dependence processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder path dependency processing" (Expand search), "code code path dependency processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec path dependency processing" (Expand search), "coder lower path dependency processing" (Expand search), "coder under path dependency processing" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder path dependency processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder path dependency processing\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder path dependency processing ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder path dependency processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.