Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder passing sequential processes" » "coder coder passing sequential process" (Expand search), "coder coder passing referential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder passing spatial processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder applying sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder possible sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder soccer passing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder after passing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder token passing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder passing sequential processes" (Expand search), "code code passing sequential processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec passing sequential processes" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder passing sequential processes") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder passing sequential processes\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder passing sequential processes ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder passing sequential processes") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.