Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder parallel interference using" » "coder coder channel interference using" (Expand search), "coder coder small interference using" (Expand search), "coder coder parallel interferences using" (Expand search), "coder coder parallel interference during" (Expand search), "coder coder parallel interference in" (Expand search), "coder over parallel interference using" (Expand search), "coder adder parallel interference using" (Expand search), "coder power parallel interference using" (Expand search), "coder decoder parallel interference using" (Expand search), "code code parallel interference using" (Expand search), "decoder codec parallel interference using" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder parallel interference using") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder parallel interference using\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder parallel interference using ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder parallel interference using") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.