Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder optimise declarative programming" » "coder coder optimise reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder optimism deliberative programming" (Expand search), "coder over optimism declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder optimized declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder optimise declarative programming" (Expand search), "code code optimise declarative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec optimise declarative programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder optimise declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder optimise declarative programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder optimise declarative programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder optimise declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.