Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder on adaptive processes" » "coder coder on adaptive process" (Expand search), "coder coder on radiative processes" (Expand search), "coder coder on adaptation processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder on adaptive processes" (Expand search), "code code on adaptive processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec on adaptive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder an adaptive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder and adaptive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder _ adaptive processes" (Expand search), "coder code on adaptive processes" (Expand search), "coder codes on adaptive processes" (Expand search), "coder powder on adaptive processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder on adaptive processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder on adaptive processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder on adaptive processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder on adaptive processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.