Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder old samples processing" » "coder coder old sample processing" (Expand search), "coder coder old complex processing" (Expand search), "coder coder old samples processed" (Expand search), "coder decoder old samples processing" (Expand search), "code code old samples processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec old samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder olds samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder solid samples processing" (Expand search), "coder coder food samples processing" (Expand search), "coder border old samples processing" (Expand search), "coder over old samples processing" (Expand search), "coder older old samples processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder old samples processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder old samples processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder old samples processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder old samples processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.