Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder noncoding adults effects" » "coder coder nonreading adults effects" (Expand search), "coder coder noncoding diets effects" (Expand search), "coder coder noncoding products effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder noncoding adults effects" (Expand search), "code code noncoding adults effects" (Expand search), "decoder codec noncoding adults effects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder noncoding adults effects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder noncoding adults effects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder noncoding adults effects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder noncoding adults effects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.