Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder new generative programming" » "coder coder new declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder new genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder new objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder new generation programming" (Expand search), "coder coder non generative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sel generative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder new generative programming" (Expand search), "code code new generative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec new generative programming" (Expand search), "coder code new generative programming" (Expand search), "coder under new generative programming" (Expand search), "coder power new generative programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder new generative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder new generative programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder new generative programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder new generative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.