Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder network sampling processes" » "coder coder network sampling process" (Expand search), "coder coder network sampling procedures" (Expand search), "coder coder network mapping processes" (Expand search), "coder coder network modeling processes" (Expand search), "coder coder network slicing processes" (Expand search), "coder coded network sampling processes" (Expand search), "coder cooler network sampling processes" (Expand search), "coder modern network sampling processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder network sampling processes" (Expand search), "code code network sampling processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec network sampling processes" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder network sampling processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder network sampling processes\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder network sampling processes ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder network sampling processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.