Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder neglecting pascal programming" » "coder coder neglecting visual programming" (Expand search), "coder coder neglecting paternal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder neglecting fetal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder neglecting physical programming" (Expand search), "coder we neglecting pascal programming" (Expand search), "coder of neglecting pascal programming" (Expand search), "coder not neglecting pascal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder neglecting pascal programming" (Expand search), "code code neglecting pascal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec neglecting pascal programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder neglecting pascal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder neglecting pascal programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder neglecting pascal programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder neglecting pascal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.