Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder motion dependent programming" » "coder coder motion independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder motion dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder motion element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder motion dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder action dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder position dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder solution dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder proper motion dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder order motions dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder motion dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code motion dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec motion dependent programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder motion dependent programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder motion dependent programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder motion dependent programming ) OR ( and python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder motion dependent programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.