Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder modeling reintegration function" » "coder coder modeling integration function" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling interaction function" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling integrating function" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling integration functional" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling integrative function" (Expand search), "coder cover modeling reintegration function" (Expand search), "coder cover modelling reintegration function" (Expand search), "coder order modeling reintegration function" (Expand search), "coder decoder modeling reintegration function" (Expand search), "code code modeling reintegration function" (Expand search), "decoder codec modeling reintegration function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder modeling reintegration function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder modeling reintegration function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder modeling reintegration function ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder modeling reintegration function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.