Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder mining based object" » "coder code mining based object" (Expand search), "coder copper mining based object" (Expand search), "coder cooper mining based object" (Expand search), "coder coder training based object" (Expand search), "coder coder sensing based object" (Expand search), "coder coder mapping based object" (Expand search), "coder coder mining and object" (Expand search), "coder decoder mining based object" (Expand search), "code code mining based object" (Expand search), "decoder codec mining based object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder mining based object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder mining based object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder mining based object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder mining based object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.