Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder mining applied text" » "coder coder sensing applied text" (Expand search), "coder coder learning applied text" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling applied text" (Expand search), "coder code mining applied text" (Expand search), "coder copper mining applied text" (Expand search), "coder cooper mining applied text" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied test" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied to" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied at" (Expand search), "coder decoder mining applied text" (Expand search), "code code mining applied text" (Expand search), "decoder codec mining applied text" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder mining applied text") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder mining applied text\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder mining applied text ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder mining applied text") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.