Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder mining applied next" » "coder coder sensing applied next" (Expand search), "coder coder learning applied next" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling applied next" (Expand search), "coder code mining applied next" (Expand search), "coder copper mining applied next" (Expand search), "coder cooper mining applied next" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applying next" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied at" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied art" (Expand search), "coder decoder mining applied next" (Expand search), "code code mining applied next" (Expand search), "decoder codec mining applied next" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder mining applied next") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder mining applied next\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder mining applied next ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder mining applied next") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.