Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder mining applied and" » "coder coder sensing applied and" (Expand search), "coder coder learning applied and" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling applied and" (Expand search), "coder code mining applied and" (Expand search), "coder copper mining applied and" (Expand search), "coder cooper mining applied and" (Expand search), "coder decoder mining applied and" (Expand search), "code code mining applied and" (Expand search), "decoder codec mining applied and" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied in" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied at" (Expand search), "coder coder mining applied alone" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder mining applied and") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder mining applied and\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder mining applied and ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder mining applied and") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.