Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder messaging process object" » "coder coder managing process object" (Expand search), "coder coder aging process object" (Expand search), "coder coder packaging process object" (Expand search), "coder coder messaging process project" (Expand search), "coder coder messaging process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder messaging process affect" (Expand search), "coder decoder messaging process object" (Expand search), "code code messaging process object" (Expand search), "decoder codec messaging process object" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder messaging process object") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder messaging process object\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder messaging process object ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder messaging process object") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.