Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder memory attention processes" » "coder coder memory attentional processes" (Expand search), "coder coder memory retention processes" (Expand search), "coder coder memory creation processes" (Expand search), "coder coder primary attention processes" (Expand search), "coder coder memory extinction processes" (Expand search), "coder poder memory attention processes" (Expand search), "coder codes memory attention processes" (Expand search), "coder border memory attention processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder memory attention processes" (Expand search), "code code memory attention processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec memory attention processes" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder memory attention processes\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder memory attention processes ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder memory attention processes") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.