Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder measuring affective programming" » "coder coder measuring objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder measuring collective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder measuring reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder measuring active programming" (Expand search), "coder coder learning affective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder mapping affective programming" (Expand search), "coder model measuring affective programming" (Expand search), "coder power measuring affective programming" (Expand search), "coder center measuring affective programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder measuring affective programming" (Expand search), "code code measuring affective programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec measuring affective programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder measuring affective programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder measuring affective programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder measuring affective programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder measuring affective programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.