Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder losing control effect" » "coder coder lasting control effect" (Expand search), "coder coder doping control effect" (Expand search), "coder coder using control effect" (Expand search), "coder coder losing contagion effect" (Expand search), "coder coder losing control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder border closing control effect" (Expand search), "coder code using control effect" (Expand search), "coder codes using control effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder losing control effect" (Expand search), "code code losing control effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec losing control effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder losing control effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder losing control effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder losing control effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder losing control effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.