Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder linear efficient programming" » "coder coder linear efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coder linear fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder linear coefficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coder like efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coder finder efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder code linear efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder order linear efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder model linear efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder linear efficient programming" (Expand search), "code code linear efficient programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec linear efficient programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder linear efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder linear efficient programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder linear efficient programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder linear efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.