Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder line duplication programming" » "coder coder line application programming" (Expand search), "coder coder line applications programming" (Expand search), "coder coder line application programing" (Expand search), "coder coder gene duplication programming" (Expand search), "coder coder gene duplications programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and duplication programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder line duplication programming" (Expand search), "code code line duplication programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec line duplication programming" (Expand search), "coder border line duplication programming" (Expand search), "coder power line duplication programming" (Expand search), "coder code lines duplication programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder line duplication programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder line duplication programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder line duplication programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder line duplication programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.