Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder learning programming representation" » "coder coder learning processing representation" (Expand search), "coder coder learning programming apresentacao" (Expand search), "coder coder learning regarding representation" (Expand search), "coder coder learning programme representation" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching programming representation" (Expand search), "coder coder learning program representation" (Expand search), "coder codes learning programming representation" (Expand search), "coder modern learning programming representation" (Expand search), "coder model learning programming representation" (Expand search), "coder decoder learning programming representation" (Expand search), "code code learning programming representation" (Expand search), "decoder codec learning programming representation" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder learning programming representation") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder learning programming representation\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder learning programming representation ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder learning programming representation") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.