Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder learning object programming" » "coder coder learning subject programming" (Expand search), "coder coder learning objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder learning content programming" (Expand search), "coder coder learning objects programming" (Expand search), "coder codes learning object programming" (Expand search), "coder modern learning object programming" (Expand search), "coder model learning object programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder learning object programming" (Expand search), "code code learning object programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec learning object programming" (Expand search)
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder learning object programming") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder learning object programming\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder learning object programming ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder learning object programming") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.