Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder lean practices programming" » "coder coder lean reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder lean practice programme" (Expand search), "coder coder lean practices program" (Expand search), "coder coder learning practices programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder lean practices programming" (Expand search), "code code lean practices programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec lean practices programming" (Expand search), "coder under lean practices programming" (Expand search), "coder lider lean practices programming" (Expand search), "coder order lean practices programming" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder lean practices programming") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder lean practices programming\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder lean practices programming ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder lean practices programming") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.