Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder lasting cognitive processing" » "coder coder lasting cognitive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder lasting cognitive process" (Expand search), "coder coder listening cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder learning cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder planning cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder longer lasting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder under fasting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder code listings cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder lasting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "code code lasting cognitive processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec lasting cognitive processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder lasting cognitive processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder lasting cognitive processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder lasting cognitive processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder lasting cognitive processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.