Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder knowing acting protocol" » "coder coder knowing aging protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder knowing action protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder knowing routing protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder knowing nothing protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder knowing writing protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder knowing doing protocol" (Expand search), "coder power knowing acting protocol" (Expand search), "coder model knowing acting protocol" (Expand search), "coder does knowing acting protocol" (Expand search), "coder decoder knowing acting protocol" (Expand search), "code code knowing acting protocol" (Expand search), "decoder codec knowing acting protocol" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder knowing acting protocol") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder knowing acting protocol\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder knowing acting protocol ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder knowing acting protocol") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.