Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder its dependent programming" » "coder coder its independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder its dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder its element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder is dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder its dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder bias dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder its dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code its dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec its dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder code its dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder power its dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder over its dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder its dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder its dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder its dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder its dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.