Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder is inductive programming" » "coder coder is disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder is objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder is reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder in inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder is indicative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder of inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder is inductive programming" (Expand search), "code code is inductive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec is inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder code is inductive programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder is inductive programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder is inductive programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder is inductive programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder is inductive programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.