Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder intense tangible programming" » "coder coder intense language programming" (Expand search), "coder coder intense visible programming" (Expand search), "coder under intense tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder more intense tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder after intense tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder intense tangible programming" (Expand search), "code code intense tangible programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec intense tangible programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder intense tangible programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder intense tangible programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder intense tangible programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder intense tangible programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.