Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder integration algorithm proposal" » "coder coder generation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder detection algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder estimation algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder code integration algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder border integration algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder model integration algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "coder decoder integration algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "code code integration algorithm proposal" (Expand search), "decoder codec integration algorithm proposal" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder integration algorithm proposal") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder integration algorithm proposal\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder integration algorithm proposal ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder integration algorithm proposal") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.