Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder instructional discourse processing" » "coder coder institutional discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder coder interactional discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder coder institutional discourses processing" (Expand search), "coder garden instructional discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder of instructional discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder and instructional discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder instructional discourse processing" (Expand search), "code code instructional discourse processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec instructional discourse processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder instructional discourse processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder instructional discourse processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder instructional discourse processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder instructional discourse processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.