Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder inductive type programming" » "coder coder inductive typed programming" (Expand search), "coder coder inductive the programming" (Expand search), "coder coder inductive time programming" (Expand search), "coder order inductive type programming" (Expand search), "coder over inductive type programming" (Expand search), "coder counter inductive type programming" (Expand search), "coder coder inductive types programming" (Expand search), "coder coder injective type programming" (Expand search), "coder coder inductive role programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder inductive type programming" (Expand search), "code code inductive type programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec inductive type programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder inductive type programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder inductive type programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder inductive type programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder inductive type programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.