Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in text processing" » "coder coder in meat processing" (Expand search), "coder coder in event processing" (Expand search), "coder coder in post processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder in text processing" (Expand search), "code code in text processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec in text processing" (Expand search), "coder code in text processing" (Expand search), "coder codes in text processing" (Expand search), "coder poder in text processing" (Expand search), "coder coder in texts processing" (Expand search), "coder coder en text processing" (Expand search), "coder coder in teeth processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in text processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in text processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in text processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in text processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.