Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in predictive project" » "coder coder in prediction project" (Expand search), "coder coder in predictive process" (Expand search), "coder coder in predictive power" (Expand search), "coder coder and predictive project" (Expand search), "coder coder _ predictive project" (Expand search), "coder coder in predicting project" (Expand search), "coder decoder in predictive project" (Expand search), "code code in predictive project" (Expand search), "decoder codec in predictive project" (Expand search), "coder code in predictive project" (Expand search), "coder codes in predictive project" (Expand search), "coder poder in predictive project" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in predictive project") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in predictive project\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in predictive project ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in predictive project") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.