Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in predicting process" » "coder coder in predictive process" (Expand search), "coder coder in prediction process" (Expand search), "coder coder in predicting protein" (Expand search), "coder coder _ predicting process" (Expand search), "coder decoder in predicting process" (Expand search), "code code in predicting process" (Expand search), "decoder codec in predicting process" (Expand search), "coder code in predicting process" (Expand search), "coder codes in predicting process" (Expand search), "coder poder in predicting process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in predicting process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in predicting process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in predicting process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in predicting process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.