Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in milking process" » "coder coder in milling process" (Expand search), "coder coder in making process" (Expand search), "coder coder in picking process" (Expand search), "coder decoder in milking process" (Expand search), "code code in milking process" (Expand search), "decoder codec in milking process" (Expand search), "coder coder in mining process" (Expand search), "coder coder of milking process" (Expand search), "coder code in milking process" (Expand search), "coder codes in milking process" (Expand search), "coder poder in milking process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in milking process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in milking process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in milking process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in milking process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.