Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder in mechanical processing" » "coder coder in mechanical properties" (Expand search), "coder coder in mechanical testing" (Expand search), "coder coder in mechanical harvesting" (Expand search), "coder coder on mechanical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder and mechanical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder _ mechanical processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder in mechanical processing" (Expand search), "code code in mechanical processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec in mechanical processing" (Expand search), "coder code in mechanical processing" (Expand search), "coder codes in mechanical processing" (Expand search), "coder poder in mechanical processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder in mechanical processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder in mechanical processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder in mechanical processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder in mechanical processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.